Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Professional Gaming i7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional Gaming i7  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 12:18
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 182
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 660
62% 513 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 2783) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.2% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 68.7
48% 59.9 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 50.6
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,288
Write 2,040
Mixed 1,579
438% 1,969 MB/s
4K Read 71.7
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 100
367% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 619
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 780
638% 886 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
St5000dm 000-1FK178 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 70 67 67 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.36% Terrible
Read 49.3
Write 70.3
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 68.6
14% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.6
8% 3.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 4.1
DQ Mixed 0.4
1% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 19%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
9GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,951
Write 1,584
Mixed 640
307% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 55.6
275% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 256
290% 470 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate ST6000VN0021-1ZA17Z 6TB
707GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 125 123 119 110 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 117%
WD WD80PUZX-64NEAY0 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 80.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 161 156 150 162 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 161
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 157
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
237% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 154 150 145 154 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$235
909GB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 161 161 157 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 109%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
15GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.3
Mixed 2
2% 1.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
2% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 22.6
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Professional Gaming i7 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional Gaming i7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback