HP h8-1234

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP h8-1234  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121203
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 16:52
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 123
54% 87 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 383
37% 304 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.1% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 61.3
56% 66.5 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 66.7
54% 65.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 369 394 389 386 397 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 448
Write 371
Mixed 259
SusWrite 380
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 32.2
120% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 238
184% 252 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 118%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 373 397 391 392 398 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 393
Write 418
Mixed 322
SusWrite 384
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 39
123% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 205
169% 242 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 121%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
20GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 120 82 114 83 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 410
Write 334
Mixed 275
SusWrite 124
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 16.6
67% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 80.2
DQ Mixed 40.8
46% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 9905584-014.A00LF Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1234 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1234

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $102
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback