Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite L845D (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Pumori
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '18 at 04:22
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-4500M APU 9,726 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 36.5 2-Core 69.6 39% 58 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 104 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 390 314 286 289 295 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 411 Write 336 Mixed 348 SusWrite 327 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 34.9 115% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 216 162% 217 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 128%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.6 8.9 8.5 7.6 8.9 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 2.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 8.2 9% 7.98 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H TS1GSK64V6H 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.8% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 9.1 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 7.2 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-4400M APUAMDBench 35%, 6,363 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7520GAMDBench 2%, 4,996 samples	5x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GBSamsungBench 40%, 253 samples	1x
HMT351S6CFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBUnknownBench 45%, 4 samples	1x
SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GBCorsairBench 22%, 359 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28