Asus CM6870

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CM6870  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6870
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 08:27
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 165
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 313
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8553) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 26.4
25% 28.9 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 28.5
25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 726 250 278 488 494 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
744GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 135 133 132 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 138
Write 128
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 134
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 100 87 98 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 130
Write 83.6
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 97.1
130% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
427GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 40.6
Write 39.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 40.6
51% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback