Medionpc MS-7713

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medionpc MS-7713 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDIONPC MS-7713
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '18 at 00:06
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 94.1 50% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 188 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2992) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.3% Good	Lighting 77 Reflection 118 Parallax 110 63% 102 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 101 Splatting 93.8 79% 96.8 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 162 164 166 164 164 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.1% Good	Read 246 Write 222 Mixed 221 SusWrite 169 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 34.1 123% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 35.2 54% 101 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 134%
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57 3,190 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 35GB free Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 162 164 166 164 164 MB/s Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.4% Above average	Read 244 Write 194 Mixed 206 SusWrite 169 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 25.7 107% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 26.1 49% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 667, 200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.7% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 9.3 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7713 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7713

CPU
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	1x
Athlon II X3 445AMD $100Bench 44%, 3,101 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 32%, 166 samples	5x
CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 48%, 298 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $105

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16