Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 206 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 509 51% 417 Pts	64-Core 537 33% 537 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6870 25,443 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 03B0) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 15 Parallax 19.2 18% 18.8 fps	MRender 12.7 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 19.7 14% 15.9 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ25 256GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 212 221 169 184 193 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 309 Write 210 Mixed 342 SusWrite 202 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 29.9 79% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 290 207% 270 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	60.8% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 20.5 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 46%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	3x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,594 samples	3x
MKNSSDTS1TB-D8 1TBMushkinBench 263%, 271 samples	3x
SSD 512GBTwinmosBench 138%, 780 samples	2x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 64GBSamsungBench 71%, 4 samples	3x
3200 C16 Series Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 24GBUnknownBench 53%, 2 samples	2x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	2x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $117