Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 36.9 2-Core 63.4 40% 57.6 Pts	4-Core 93.1 8-Core 91 12% 92.1 Pts	64-Core 93.2 6% 93.2 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21D0) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.42 Parallax 1.09 2% 1.94 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.79 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 97 105 109 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 282 Write 210 Mixed 224 SusWrite 108 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 21.8 70% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 170 122% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 10GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.8% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.3 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	2x

GPU
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	1x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1x

SSD
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 42%, 199 samples	1x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $431