Today's hottest deals

Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '18 at 10:44
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 796
70% 596 Pts
64-Core 2,018
125% 2,018 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
Asus(1043 032E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 27.1
24% 24 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 20.5
16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 297 295 291 293 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 305
Mixed 301
SusWrite 294
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 29.2
145% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 226
202% 306 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0-CK 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 22
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback