Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-V  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '18 at 11:42
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 367
45% 346 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 8390) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 19.4
18% 22.1 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 23.3
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$130
909GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 49 80 95 109 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 61.2
Write 61.7
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 81.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 69%
Kingston DTR30G2 64GB
43GB free, PID 16a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 20 26 12 16 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 10
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 18.3
21% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/2G Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF GR1333D364L9/2G Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback