Sony SVT13112FXS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVT13112FXS  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '18 at 14:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 131
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 166
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sony(104D 90A8) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2626
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 2.75
3% 3.32 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7.09
4% 4.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 75 67 34 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 92.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 59.9
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 58%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB
26GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 3.9 4.3 5.6 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
5% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 12.8
Mixed 8
SusWrite 5.2
14% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
39% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/8G 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVT13112FXS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVT13112FXS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback