Asus M4A87TD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110623
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 10 '18 at 14:02
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45% Average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 15.1
2-Core 61.8
29% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 280
29% 235 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0448) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.9% Poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 58.4
15% 33.6 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 39.3
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 307 276 287 285 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 385
Write 348
Mixed 318
SusWrite 290
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 25.2
88% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 257
190% 251 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
709GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 118 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 138
Write 111
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 118
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-126.A02LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 13.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 6.6
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback