Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '18 at 23:33
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 193
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 617
65% 520 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 113
Parallax 95.9
83% 104 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 94
Splatting 100
80% 97 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KSQ240 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H180920
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 325 327 329 331 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
835GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 165 162 160 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 151
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 161
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451R7AFR8C 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.2% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback