Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2939-A1
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime22.9 Days
Run DateNov 12 '18 at 08:53
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 144
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 499
46% 385 Pts
64-Core 1,625
101% 1,625 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 537GB
63GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 182 181 174 167 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.5% Good
Read 548
Write 313
Mixed 429
SusWrite 178
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 18.5
75% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 211
157% 208 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 65%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 859GB
381GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 186 189 185 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.8% Good
Read 535
Write 278
Mixed 396
SusWrite 180
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 17.7
67% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 204 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
381GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 150 145 130 144 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.4% Above average
Read 497
Write 279
Mixed 390
SusWrite 140
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 17.5
68% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 204
155% 208 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 215GB
56GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 198 195 203 205 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.6% Good
Read 529
Write 310
Mixed 387
SusWrite 203
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 19.1
69% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 199
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 752GB
357GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 112 125 125 131 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
Read 495
Write 274
Mixed 390
SusWrite 129
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 18.2
64% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 204
152% 201 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
243GB free
Firmware: 0.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 148 144 148 146 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.4% Good
Read 544
Write 317
Mixed 432
SusWrite 154
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 19
73% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 202
151% 200 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 1GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0.3
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 548
Write 269
Mixed 354
86% 390 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 21.1
76% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 206
148% 192 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 2GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0.3
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 537
Write 307
Mixed 421
93% 422 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 19.4
76% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 207
154% 206 MB/s
Netapp LUN C-Mode Multi-Path Disk Device 1GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0.3
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 547
Write 332
Mixed 424
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 20.6
72% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 212
157% 206 MB/s
LSI RAID SAS 6G 0/1 299GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 65 65 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 147
Write 63.8
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 63.8
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GB
8 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 35
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback