MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 19:38
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$36
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 87.2
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 177
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8431) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 11.8
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12
Splatting 13
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 113 97 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 108
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 74%
Generic Flash Disk 34GB
16GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 7.2 6.1 6.3 7.3 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Read 3.3
Write 3.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.4
8% 5.15 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FHP 075D GR2133D464L15S/4G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.4% Very good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 2,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback