Lenovo 20235

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20235  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateNov 14 '18 at 01:38
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 64.3
37% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 151
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 2.44
3% 3.59 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 2
Splatting 6.74
4% 4.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 55 58 61 76 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 195
Write 37.5
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 56.2
20% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 13.3
50% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 45.3
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 42.5
32% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 53%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
577GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 35 36 36 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 33.8
Write 35.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 35
45% 33 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 8.3
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20235 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20235

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback