Today's hottest deals

HP 500-152ea

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-152ea  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime29.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '18 at 12:03
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 112
52% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 195
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
PowerColor(148C 2390) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 23.2
16% 23 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 31.4
21% 25 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 35 49 39 53 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 419
Write 86
Mixed 103
SusWrite 45.1
35% 163 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 17.1
67% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 37.1
41% 70 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
615GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 160 156 159 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 84.2
Mixed 106
SusWrite 158
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-152ea Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 500-152ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback