Asus X510UQ

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus X510UQ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X510UQ
Memory	9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '18 at 13:44
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	28%
CPU Throttled	93%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 96 2-Core 167 71% 118 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 303 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 145E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6025 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.36% Terrible	Lighting 7.53 Reflection 10 Parallax 6.62 6% 8.07 fps	MRender 9.57 Gravity 6.63 Splatting 0.09 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.36% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 265 245 233 223 207 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 428 Mixed 308 SusWrite 256 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 51.3 173% 60.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 358 269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 233GB free Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 424 366 294 294 294 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 382 Mixed 351 SusWrite 347 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 54.7 184% 64.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 356 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSO4GX4M1A2133C15 029E CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 12GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	69.1% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 21.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X510UQ Builds (Compare 308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UQ

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	154x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	142x
Core i7-7500U VHIntelBench 52%, 2,074 samples	9x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	217x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	90x
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	30x
THNSNK128GVN8 128GBToshibaBench 56%, 2,065 samples	30x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	11x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	56x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	40x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 48%, 3,269 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16