Today's hottest deals

Asus 1015E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus 1015E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015E
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 00:44
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 43.9
34% 46 Pts
4-Core 47.2
8-Core 46
6% 46.6 Pts
64-Core 46
3% 46 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 115D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.45 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Moweek 240GB 240GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 314 370 376 232 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.8% Above average
Read 429
Write 372
Mixed 337
SusWrite 299
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 13.1
63% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 22.3
39% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264HZ-1G6D 1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1015E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1015E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback