Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 16:02
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 119
56% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 191
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7730
Sapphire(174B E252) 2GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 10.7
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 8.23
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.91 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 114 122 121 123 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 92.8
Write 94
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 117
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773SB0- M378B5773QB0- 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-DS2 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback