ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G7760

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G7760 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G7760
Memory	20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120113
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '16 at 14:10
Run Duration	668 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 201 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 515 53% 428 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Nvidia(10DE 086A) 1.5GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Lighting 28.3 Reflection 43.1 Parallax 31.6 23% 34.3 fps	MRender 43 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 31.9 26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8988721 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 41154376638680 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1689 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 74 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 46 77312426014 (C2) HDA temperature 30 46 77312426014 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8988721 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8988721 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8988721 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15807 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12118 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12118 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10256	76.2% Very good	Read 485 Write 225 Mixed 266 72% 325 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 20 114% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 71.7 92% 166 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 94%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 66GB free Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8553 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1841 (B1) Unknown 98 98 37 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 55 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 82 (EB) Unknown 99 99 169 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4290571972	57.9% Above average	Read 249 Write 246 Mixed 255 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 22.4 88% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 70.7 71% 116 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 364GB free Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 132651384 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2021 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 15928922 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9107 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1840 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 50 672989224 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 11704 (C2) HDA temperature 40 50 60129542184 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -121345711005639 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12173120541 (F2) Unknown 100 253 54359338524	71% Very good	Read 128 Write 120 Mixed 103 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.17 66% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 87GB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 69237360 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1692 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8180124 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8278 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1609 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 458759 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 62 50 639434790 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6203 (C2) HDA temperature 38 50 73014444070 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -72129680761193 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12411923169 (F2) Unknown 100 253 8313343809	87.7% Excellent	Read 181 Write 125 Mixed 110 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.24 62% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 67GB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 85091392 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2198 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 34042409 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10123 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2037 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 62 50 639434790 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 81 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 33252 (C2) HDA temperature 38 50 73014444070 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 51539607560778 (F1) Unknown 100 253 15025793913 (F2) Unknown 100 253 27314134407	51.7% Above average	Read 105 Write 75.4 Mixed 102 71% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.66 4K Mixed 0.16 46% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 96%
LITEONIT LCT-128M3S 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 23GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	147% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 117 Mixed 113 159% 131 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 13.1 1,553% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 41.4 DQ Mixed 12.7 1,925% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 147%
Generic- Compact Flash 1GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.18% Terrible	Read 6.13 Write 1.84 Mixed 2.84 4% 3.61 MB/s	4K Read 1.96 4K Write 0.14 4K Mixed 0.14 17% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.18% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 KHX1600C9D3/8GX Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback