Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 48.2 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 31.2 23% 31.8 Pts	4-Core 30.8 8-Core 31.2 4% 31 Pts	64-Core 24.6 2% 24.6 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21EC) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1501.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: PB3OC60N SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 44 48 58 61 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 69.5 Write 64.8 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 55.6 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 42%
JMicron 500GB 545 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 49GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 22 22 22 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 23.1 Write 24.9 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 21.6 17% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 67%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 8GB 4,031 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5572 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.5 1.8 3 3.4 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	7.01% Terrible	Read 19.4 Write 8.2 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 3 11% 9.57 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.1 79% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.01% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 535359333132384D 06C1 53535A333132384D 3GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 12%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM