Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 20:19
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 583
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Acer(1025 0793) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
809GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 164 137 163 169 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 178
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 158
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 112%
JMicron 250GB
171GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 84.7
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 87.7
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport 500GB
147GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 73
Write 73.1
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 64.6
86% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback