' '

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System' '  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-1492
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '18 at 08:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 109
58% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 185
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 10E3) 752MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3186
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 5.69
4% 5.6 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.48
4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 72 93 99 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 73
Write 75
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 89.3
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HXMSH2GS03A2F1CL16 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ' Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: ' '

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback