Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '18 at 15:45
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 967
87% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,284
80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
87% 108 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 100
Splatting 91.7
78% 96.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 5 511GB
454GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 301 660 552 568 695 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 153
Write 438
Mixed 125
SusWrite 506
70% 306 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 2.7
14% 6.5 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 234
216% 320 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 157%
Amd-raid OCZ-AGILITY3 120GB
109GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 92 95 96 99 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 158
Write 125
Mixed 132
SusWrite 97.1
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 19.2
78% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.6
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 44.3
43% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 38%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 970 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 960 822 614 618 619 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,371
Write 2,345
Mixed 1,444
SusWrite 749
334% 1,477 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 62
206% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 592
461% 618 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 193%
Great: 278%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA HDWE160 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 114 122 121 125 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 170
Write 127
Mixed 37
SusWrite 122
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
372% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 96%
Amd-raid WDC WD15EARS-00Z 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 68 69 65 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 100
Write 68.9
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 72.4
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
4GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.3
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 28.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 24.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback