Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L850-B191

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L850-B191  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 06:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 138
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 198
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.932.5.3000
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 6.46
Parallax 5.31
6% 6.16 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 6.65
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 199 95 89 93 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 394
Write 307
Mixed 307
SusWrite 152
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 27.3
97% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 210
187% 279 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
195GB free
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 84.3
Write 86
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 75.3
50% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback