Today's hottest deals

MSI A88X-G45 GAMING(MS-7900)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7900
MotherboardMSI A88X-G45 GAMING(MS-7900)  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 14:37
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 130
55% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 224
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 2.47
2% 2.78 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 2.61
2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 54 35 33 32 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 323
Write 374
Mixed 296
SusWrite 54.6
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 31.1
107% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 54.3
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 71.8
58% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid Array 2 16TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 99 94 85 82 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 46.8
Write 116
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 108
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.5
197% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 232%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 8.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 10.9
14% 12 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX CT102464BD160B.M16 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 32GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.8% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback