HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1985
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 15:44
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 71.8
40% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 89.9
13% 95.1 Pts
64-Core 82.4
5% 82.4 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual Graphics
HP(103C 1985) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 4.47
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 3.77
Splatting 5.35
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 134 136 141 131 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 260
Write 142
Mixed 174
SusWrite 143
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 16.1
66% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 49.5
DQ Write 51
DQ Mixed 43.1
34% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
876GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 129 119 132 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 71.8
Write 114
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 129
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0
67% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback