Oegstone H81M-P33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemOegstone H81M-P33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 12:44
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 193
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 286
37% 281 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 7817) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3960
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 5.16
3% 4.62 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.52
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 98 101 98 88 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 124
Write 69.5
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 90.8
67% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-560.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Oegstone H81M-P33 (MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback