Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2355C19

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2355C19  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2355C19
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJun 21 '16 at 08:11
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 145
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 197
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2200) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.12
4% 4.21 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 8.65
4% 4.89 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LE1i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 473
Write 171
Mixed 256
66% 300 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 8.51
65% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 51.1
DQ Mixed 51.8
34% 40 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 88%
Kingston SSDNow KC300 120GB-$80
36GB free
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 489
Write 180
Mixed 227
65% 299 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 10
65% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 53.4
64% 112 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 86%
Freecom Public-Disk 2TB
1TB free, PID fc95
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 21.7
Mixed 24.6
31% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.27
67% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback