Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is relative performance (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	7.11% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Relative performance (0^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core 2 Duo P9xxx (Penryn Class Core 2) 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.9% Average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 77.8 38% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 215 25% 194 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.8 1.9 7.6 6.4 1.6 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	7.11% Terrible	Read 64.3 Write 13.9 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 6.2 6% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4.9 13% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 7.11% Great: 64%
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 9GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 43 65 80 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.9% Very poor	Read 142 Write 67.3 Mixed 122 SusWrite 54.2 22% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 7.9 25% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 55%
Qemu HARDDISK 32GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 6GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 112 Write 98.1 Mixed 85.6 22% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.2 10% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Virtuozzo 1x14GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 1 slots used 14GB DIMM RAM Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 0.1 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM