Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 11:13
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$152
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 283
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 929
90% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,147
71% 1,147 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 113
Parallax 96.6
84% 105 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 95.8
79% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 815 636 757 727 688 597 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 572
Write 523
Mixed 554
SusWrite 703
133% 588 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 51.1
177% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 490
DQ Mixed 530
408% 558 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 146%
Great: 147%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
464GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 387 458 441 451 424 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 153
Mixed 248
SusWrite 441
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 35.5
133% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 245
197% 281 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
852GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 195 186 174 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 37.5
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 188
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 2TB
589GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 48 54 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 73.6
Write 22.3
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 51.6
36% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 92%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 54 56 55 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 179
Write 134
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 52.6
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 102%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 54 56 55 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 52.6
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 2TB
775GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 48 54 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 92.4
Write 84.3
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 51.6
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 23.3
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 27.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 3,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback