Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 430 14,318 User benchmarks, average bench 39% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 62.6 1-Core 34.8 2-Core 75.2 37% 57.5 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 152 17% 132 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 905A) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8880 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.37% Terrible	Lighting 2.73 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 1.16 2% 2.68 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 2.96 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.37% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Volume0 128GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 341 334 333 339 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 277 Write 314 Mixed 158 SusWrite 309 60% 265 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 11.2 55% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 31.4 29% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 61%
ASMT 2115 128GB 304 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 30GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 22 23 23 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 27.5 Write 18.5 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 22.7 30% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 4.8 336% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 198%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.6 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM