Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9PE-D16 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory	56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131108
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '18 at 21:20
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 137 57% 95 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 429 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 1,000 62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000 1,288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% HP(103C 076F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 5.2GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 16.9 Reflection 22.1 Parallax 14.8 14% 17.9 fps	MRender 25.6 Gravity 14 Splatting 23.7 18% 21.1 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 480GB 804 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.28 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 132 137 137 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 208 Write 143 Mixed 128 SusWrite 134 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 14.3 56% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 34.1 DQ Mixed 65.4 49% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 41%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 80 83 84 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 127 Write 131 Mixed 94 SusWrite 81.8 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 951GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 85 89 88 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 85.6 Write 87.5 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 87.4 58% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 125 127 124 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 131 Write 124 Mixed 101 SusWrite 125 89% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: AB50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 105 113 110 116 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 89.1 Write 86 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 112 63% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 923GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 90 92 93 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 92.1 Write 73.3 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 90.9 59% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 698GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 84 87 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 86.7 Write 73.2 Mixed 62 SusWrite 85.2 57% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 59%
SDXC Card 260GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 242GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 15 24 19 24 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 7.5 Mixed 14 SusWrite 20.8 22% 18 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 65% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH 4x16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.8% Below average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.6 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	4x
Xeon E5-2687W 0Intel $1,335Bench 74%, 868 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	4x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $65Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	6x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
Raid VD 480GBMarvellBench 83%, 129 samples	3x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31... 128GBHynixBench 83%, 4 samples	3x
M393B2K70CM0-YF 12x16GBSamsungBench 53%, 8 samples	3x
M393B2K70CM0-YF 4x16GBSamsungBench 50%, 5 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353