Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 21:28
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 147 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 287 38% 285 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0867) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.99% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.99% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 240GB 5,900 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA10.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 140 46 72 77 7.7 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 235 Write 221 Mixed 199 SusWrite 66.4 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 13.8 49% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 153 126% 181 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 275GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 104 105 104 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 101 Write 104 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 103 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73BH0-CK0 68GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.1% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11.9 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16