Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Supermicro X10DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10DAI
Memory	118.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180627
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '18 at 11:41
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 987 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 77 2-Core 157 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 612 54% 459 Pts	64-Core 1,922 119% 1,922 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.5% Below average	Lighting 44.6 Reflection 51.6 Parallax 41.9 36% 46 fps	MRender 63.8 Gravity 44.7 Splatting 58.2 46% 55.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 88%
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2990) CLim: 1456 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 417.22 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.5% Below average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 51.5 Parallax 41.9 36% 46 fps	MRender 63.8 Gravity 44.7 Splatting 58.3 46% 55.6 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 83%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 960GB-$397 1,581 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: 001B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 356 Write 382 Mixed 305 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 31.8 113% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 66.8 122% 240 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 111%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 316GB free Firmware: R060 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 312 Write 368 Mixed 325 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 32.3 112% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 316 238% 318 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 668GB free Firmware: R060 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 341 Write 18.2 Mixed 32.3 27% 130 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 17.1 72% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 325 DQ Write 17.9 DQ Mixed 32.8 59% 125 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 105%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 288GB free Firmware: R060 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 290 Write 358 Mixed 327 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 69.8 4K Mixed 32.9 112% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 327 244% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,997 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 104 Write 92 Mixed 77 20% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 0.6 6% 3.17 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 7.1 DQ Mixed 1.8 2% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 18%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: ACF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 190 Write 192 Mixed 35.8 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2.5TB free Firmware: ACF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 190 Write 154 Mixed 38 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 108%
Seagate ST8000NE0021-2EN 8TB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 5TB free Firmware: EN02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,669 Write 50 Mixed 83.3 671% 934 MB/s	4K Read 396 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 4.7 17,044% 134 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 127%
Inateck 2TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 38.5 Write 40.3 Mixed 37 50% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.1 176% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386A4G40DM1-CRC 4x31.8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.7% Above average	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 16.6 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 15.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	12x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	9x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	7x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	4x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 8x8GBHynixBench 109%, 271 samples	3x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $206

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16