Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 21:16
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 399
53% 397 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 37.3
31% 35.4 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 35.3
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
663GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 130 124 124 126 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 178
Write 178
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 123
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 108%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 0121
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 9.6 9.7 9.7 6.2 9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Read 16
Write 6
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 8.4
10% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 5%
ST350041 2AS 500GB
331GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 39
Write 42
Mixed 31
SusWrite 41.4
52% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback