Today's hottest deals

Acer Revo RL80

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Revo RL80  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Revo RL80
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '18 at 11:35
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2377M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 69.9
44% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 101
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 074C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2792
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 1.28
2% 2.02 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 229
Write 172
Mixed 132
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 13.4
51% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 33.2
DQ Mixed 61.3
48% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Revo RL80 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Revo RL80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback