Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111013
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '18 at 15:55
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	67%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 125 57% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 285 32% 253 Pts	64-Core 277 17% 277 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.1.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Lighting 67.4 Reflection 71 Parallax 90.2 55% 76.2 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 58.2 53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 61 54 55 54 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 358 Write 55.5 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 53.5 30% 138 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 33.5 4K Mixed 32 101% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 13 DQ Write 63.6 DQ Mixed 29.5 25% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 71 58 56 55 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 126 Write 109 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 57.5 65% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2.5 432% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 377GB free Firmware: 1AA01107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 73 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 76.2 Write 88.5 Mixed 52.8 SusWrite 75.3 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 131GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 1.6 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 67.2 Write 67 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 1.2 60% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 930GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 95 96 96 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 118 Write 65 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 94.4 110% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%
WDC WD50 02ABYS-02B1B0 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 438GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 93 95 96 95 95 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.9% Average	Read 110 Write 115 Mixed 74 SusWrite 93.1 132% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%
KINGSTON SA400S37120G 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 52GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 3.2 1.1 0.6 0.9 9.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 247 Write 208 Mixed 204 SusWrite 4.2 208% 166 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 17.8 1,459% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 33.9 DQ Mixed 23.8 2,043% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 12.6 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	572x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	111x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	75x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359