Asus GL702ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702ZC
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateDec 22 '18 at 02:12
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 196
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 638
62% 508 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 1A60) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1077 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.2% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 54.2
33% 50.4 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 47.5
39% 47.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 442 448 452 377 290 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 449
Mixed 428
SusWrite 407
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 47.9
159% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 251
194% 264 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
493GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 106 106 105 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 65.8
Write 105
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 103
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.1
132% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.2% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 27.3
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702ZC Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback