| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Precision T1500 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T1500 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091130 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 26 '18 at 12:48 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.4%
Above average
|
56% 95.1 Pts
|
34% 273 Pts
|
20% 317 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
92.3%
Outstanding
|
86% 124 fps
|
104% 131 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 166 112 95 88 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
39% 173 MB/s
|
106% 35.3 MB/s
|
146% 195 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
48GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 165 168 162 156 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
40% 179 MB/s
|
107% 35.3 MB/s
|
75% 144 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT325U7EFR8A-PB 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1600 MHz
|
28.1%
Poor
|
27% 9.57 GB/s
|
22% 7.7 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T1500 Builds (Compare 415 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T1500
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 149x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 121x |
| Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 63x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 33x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 22x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $367 |