Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 15:12
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 787
73% 609 Pts
64-Core 1,185
73% 1,185 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 30.6
27% 33.7 fps
MRender 46.7
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 42.6
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1734 703 660 626 671 672 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,404
Write 2,074
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 844
378% 1,692 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 81.2
271% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 751
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 698
521% 694 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 263%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB (TurboPC EX)
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 318 304 315 298 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 482
Mixed 408
SusWrite 316
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 56.1
186% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 113%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB (TurboPC EX)
362GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 464 443 462 436 419 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 462
Mixed 411
SusWrite 446
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 54.8
179% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Samsung 840 PRO Series (TurboPC EX) 256GB
104GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 440 450 475 422 500 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 32
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 27.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $513
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback