Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Clevo W35_37ET

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Clevo W35_37ET (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO W35_37ET
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121026
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '14 at 12:22
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 98.3 2-Core 196 67% 147 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 532 55% 442 Pts	64-Core 533 33% 533 Pts
Poor: 40% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 512GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 332GB free Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 72 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1581 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 12 (AE) Unknown 100 100 30 (B5) Unknown 100 100 420909744180 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 141 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	45.1% Average	Read 495 Write 225 Mixed 302 75% 341 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 8.17 37% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 13.3 DQ Mixed 9.97 8% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 102%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74 4,600 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 72GB free Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 275 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1580 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 34 (AE) Unknown 100 100 28 (B5) Unknown 100 100 3805349872366 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 285 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 149 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2297 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	56.1% Above average	Read 508 Write 253 Mixed 335 81% 365 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 6.88 56% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 80.5 DQ Mixed 7.36 29% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 81%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 13GB free Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 499 Write 192 Mixed 279 71% 323 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 4.46 60% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 5.91 44% 102 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical W35_37ET Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Clevo W35_37ET

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	73x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	7x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	64x
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	27x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $79Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 51%, 1,341 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 470 samples	6x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,121 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Clevo W35_37ET

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Clevo W35_37ET

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)