Today's hottest deals

Asus Z9NA-D6C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9NA-D6C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9NA-D6C
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '16 at 16:24
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2450 0
Socket-B2 1356, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 51.7
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 111
42% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 445
40% 334 Pts
64-Core 1,140
70% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 39.8
40% 44.6 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 37
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 243GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 316
Write 426
Mixed 317
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 8.56
48% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 12.6
DQ Write 29.1
DQ Mixed 8.25
10% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 145%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00 4x8GB
4 of 6 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9NA-D6C Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Z9NA-D6C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback