HP p7-1490

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP p7-1490  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory17.7 GB free of 22 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140616
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 05:50
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 139
59% 98 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 208
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.47
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 0.06
0% 10.4 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 0.04
18% 25.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
525GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 151 136 155 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 146
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 34.7
Write 34.4
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 36.3
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 22GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback