| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | Quanta TWH (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Quanta TWH |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 8 |
| BIOS Date | 20100119 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 31 '18 at 07:48 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.5%
Above average
|
56% 88.1 Pts
|
30% 229 Pts
|
15% 243 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Quanta(152D 0873) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
1.24%
Terrible
|
1% 1.41 fps
|
2% 1.81 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 107 126 125 126 117 MB/s
|
69.7%
Good
|
75% 337 MB/s
|
105% 34.7 MB/s
|
153% 211 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$22
217GB free
Firmware: D005DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 71 71 70 68 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
46% 62.1 MB/s
|
119% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya M2S4G64CB8HB5N-BE M2S2G64CB88B5N-BE 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24%
Poor
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
49% 81 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TWH Builds (Compare 77 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Quanta TWH
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 23x |
| Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 18x |
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 54x |
| GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples | 13x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $227 |