Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa 2509

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 2509  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Extensa 2509
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150909
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 19:22
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 17.8
2-Core 26.8
26% 33.4 Pts
4-Core 34
8-Core 35.8
5% 34.9 Pts
64-Core 33
2% 33 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 0905) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.94
1% 0.99 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.45 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 39 37 30 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 73.2
Mixed 34
SusWrite 36.9
36% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 61%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
29GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3.3
6% 5 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Kingston 9905469-157.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 2509 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 2509

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback