HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory3.8 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 21:33
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 167
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 646
57% 484 Pts
64-Core 951
59% 951 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295
Nvidia(10DE 062E) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 332.50
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.96
1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.6
Write 43.9
Mixed 64.6
51% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
971GB free
Firmware: JP2O
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 399
Write 297
Mixed 104
195% 267 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1.2
311% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 25.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback