Toshiba Satellite P55-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite P55-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10ST
Memory0.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '16 at 20:40
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 41.4
2-Core 53.4
36% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 126
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA48) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 2.59
1% 2.04 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 3
2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 169
Write 85.3
Mixed 105
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 10.2
58% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 23.5
38% 73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 6GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 0.8
SC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.6 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite P55-A Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P55-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback