Fujitsu LIFEBOOK AH532/G52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK AH532/G52  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB2B
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '16 at 16:43
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 109
55% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 163
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M
Fujitsu(10CF 1766) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6869
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 1.5
2% 3.02 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47% Average
Read 77.6
Write 86.2
Mixed 84.4
62% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.2
66% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
6GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 7.29
Mixed 11.7
15% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.32
4K Write 0.45
4K Mixed 1.52
87% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 04CD F3-10666CL9-4GBSQ 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK AH532/G52 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK AH532/G52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback