Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook E14 E402WAS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook E14 E402WAS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E402WAS
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '19 at 16:52
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-6110 APU R2 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 49.6
1-Core 23
2-Core 46.2
27% 39.6 Pts
4-Core 89.1
8-Core 88.1
12% 88.6 Pts
64-Core 88.2
6% 88.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Asus(1043 1E50) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 2.34
1% 2.29 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.65
2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BHT WR202I0032G E70245F5 31GB
10GB free
Firmware: 450100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 29 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 162
Write 111
Mixed 118
SusWrite 27.9
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 7
26% 8.23 MB/s
DQ Read 7.8
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 8.2
7% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 17%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 273 218 213 220 226 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook E14 E402WAS Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook E14 E402WAS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback